Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Kirby Heybourne: Needy Father or Sell-out?

I will add my two e-bits to the pot and suggest that the recent controversy surround Kirby Heyborne's (you know...Mr. Mormon cinema...he was the RM and also played significant parts in Singles Ward, Saints and Soldiers, and The Best Two Years) cameo in a Miller Lite Beer commercial. Heyborne has recently defended his action as Heavenly Father's way of helping him "stay afloat for another year." See his full remarks here. From my conversations (largely within Happy Valley), however, Heyborne is universally seen as a sell-out. To these folks, however Heyborne wants to spin it, he is still profiting from a business that is not compatible with the LDS lifestyle.

Herein is a major fault-line in gospel thought. Yes, he who does not take care of his household is "worse than an infidel." And sometimes, the early Latter Day Saints were to become friends with the "mammon of unrighteousness." But how far can this approach be taken w/o leading us to simply becoming a part of a wicked bureaucracy where we can all distance ourselves from the fundamental evil of the company/institution? Could a faithful Latter Day Saint be a white collar desk clerk for Playboy? Could a faithful Latter Day Saint work as a product rep. for Coors? Awkward questions indeed.

Addendum

Upon further reflection and some prodding from a good friend of mine, I have thought some about Heyborne's predicament. It's true...new, less-than-well-known actors make approximately 1,000 dollars more than crap/year. And when you're in da biz, there's something to be said for taking care of one's family. From a strict public relations point-of-view, I still wish he hadn't done it, wish he had taken any other odd-job, but then again, there are many things that I wish my family/friends (including myself) wouldn't do. And yet I still care about them deeply...and these are people I know. I certainly wouldn't make a personal attack over the blogosphere. I don't even know Heyborne. If I had known him personally and had been on close terms, I might have even privately expressed what I did in this blog. For public consumption, however, I should have tempered my remarks to fit the requirements of the charity that befits Latter Day Saints, should have shown my concern without such a biting edge. In previous posts, I have confined my remarks to the criticism of ideas, trends, culture. Such things can be fixed on an individual level w/o anyone losing face. But in the temple we are instructed to speak kindly of others individually...that includes individuals in the public eye.

So Kirby...you'll never read this. But let it be the known that anyone who keeps their temple worthiness up deserves my silence and everyone--temple-worthy or otherwise--deserves my charity. As Augustine noted: "In the essentials, unity, in the non-essentials, liberty, and in all things, charity."

3 comments:

Syphax said...

[insert obligatory "you'll understand when you're a father, Russ" statement here]

I find myself endlessly amused by Mormon "controversy." We love so much to debate the morality of the decisions of others. A society of wagging fingers and "tsk tsk tsk."

Bring up to these Mormons certain hot-topic names... Richard Dutcher, Brother Marriott, Harry Reid... and they'll give you their point-by-point list on why they think the accused is moral, or why they are just a cog in the machinations of the adversary. I feel that the only person who needs to decide what is moral is the person approaching the moral crossroads themselves, with the inclusion perhaps of their priesthood leaders (because that's what authority is for). Otherwise I'm not sure why we get so much joy out of our weighing others in the balance.

When I come across those moral crossroads myself, I've found that the whispers and stares of others do not help me make the right decision. They just muddy up the water and cause me to worry more about pleasing men than God.

In summary, why is "Kirby Heybourne" any of our business? He is an actor with many roles. He's not our spokesman. Who cares?

Russtafarian said...

Alas, I understand the ethical dilemma involved...and I completely understand Latter Day Saints' propensity to judge. It's not good, and maybe in this case, I crossed the line a bit. And in many ways, I don't blame Heyborne....actors don't make a lot of money, esp. if they're just starting out. Heyborne feels completely comfortable in believing that Heavenly Father sent the beer commercial his way. I respect that. And there's something to be said for taking care of one's family...

(now for the ominous, "but")...

For me, I consider Heyborne to be a quasi-(indeed, pathetically quasi) public figure. Now if Heyborne had decided to work at a restaurant mixing drinks or at a casino fixing slot machines, I would probably be less perturbed at it. There are faithful Latter Day Saints who do both. Both bother me, but any harm they are promoting is geographically limited to the few who cross their path. Do I still find it distasteful? Absolutely. What is the difference between t and participating in a beer commercial? Dissemination. So admittedly, the effect was certainly more poignant on the Saints than the rest of the population.

The main effect was that it teaches the Saints the realities of showbiz. And there is a contigent of people out there who actually do see Mormon cinema as a legitimate counterculture (may the Lord have mercy upon them!).

And finally, the problem I see with using the "taking care of one's family" argument is that it can open up the floodgates to any number of things. A dear single mother decides to work at Hooters to help pay the bills, for example. Would it keep them out of the temple? Probably not, but it's promoting a certain culture that is all too pervasive.

The end...snide remarks welcome.

Syphax said...

Yes, it's all unfortunate, but my point is, what gives us the right to bring it up at all?

Kirby Heybourne, Mormon Drink-Mixer Guy, Mormon Slot-Machine Repair Guy, Mormon Single-Mother Hooters Waitress... or even Mormon Tobacco Farmer Guy, Mormon Guy Who Plays in a Bar Cover Band?

What makes us feel that we can even breathe a WORD weighing their characters? At all? What gives us the right to say what "damage" they're doing... or to write blogs about them?

I firmly believe that God has not given us that that right.

What "damage" have YOU done in your life? Do I have the right to create a blog about that? What if you became famous? Does that suddenly give me the right? Since we have the same religion? Since you suddenly are in plain view of the nation? Are you suddenly responsible to me personally?