I found out something rather sad recently; a friend of mine has been diagnosed with Anorexia Nervosa (along with her other oh-so-pleasant issues). While it would be wrong to blame men for these things, neither do I think that we could go w/o some self-reflection. On the converse, while men are not often diagnosed with it (though it does happen), do women similarly hold standards to where they expect their guy to essentially be a freak of nature (at least a freak that happens to conform with their particular idea of beauty)? For our talk of spiritual compatibility, at the end of the day, are we just as superficial as the next Joe or Jane? Is the primary difference that active Latter Day Saints know how to keep their urges in check? What is the relationship between romance and spirituality, between noticing a pretty figure and "recognizing" (perhaps even in a Saturday's Warrior sort-of-way...heaven forgive me for ever enjoying that PR-nightmare of Mormon cinema) a "sweet spirit."
While I do not propose to delve into that can of worms about the difference between men and women concerning physical attractiveness, I do notice that the men in the Latter Day Saint community are no less concerned with physical attractiveness than most men...they just might describe their attractiveness in a more tamed way. From my experience, Mormons are not immune to the hormones that make the world go around. Yet the instructions we receive related to dating are remarkably (and rightfully, in my view) asexual. The cute aphorism in marriage is always to "marry your best friend." Yet we all know that many of us had that super-tight friend of the opposite gender that we wouldn't be caught dead marrying. We just didn't like them "in that way."
In my interactions with my fellows, when girls are beautiful, the first personality characteristic they are assumed to have is not spirituality. Rather, they are assumed to be "fun," "bubbly." And there are just as many complaints at BYU about guys going after the thin, could-find-shade-under-barbed-wire, girls as anywhere else. How often do we ask the rhetorical question of the beautiful single adults: "How is it that you are not married?" Not so with our resident "sweet spirits." Do we tend to mentally consign them to a life of lonely competence...perhaps working as a librarian somewhere? So I wonder: Have we set up a dichotomy between "spiritual" people and "beautiful" people?
And how vulnerable are we Latter Day Saints to the impact of the media? Sure, we might dismiss them as morally bankrupt and call admiring them our "guilty pleasures," but let's be honest: if the most morally questionable Hollywood star were to miraculously have an Alma experience and become the best Mormon YSA in her respective ward, you can bet that s/he would bump even the most solid guy/girl down the list for dates.
For men, (and I risk being seriously contradicted here), I am going to suggest that few men (LDS or otherwise) would call Cameron Diaz, the Brittany Spears of yesteryear, or most supermodels anything less than very attractive (provided some of them lose the heroin eyes and their horrifically layered makeup). but how much would even LDS men be willing to sacrifice by way of personality if the girls they were dating looked like them?
And for women, how many women would pick a younger version of Mitt Romney over the guys they are currently dating (imagine for a moment that Mitt Romney was not going to be ridiculously wealthy)? Or having a worthy priesthood holder who looked like Michael Phelps? If media is the source and marriage is eternal, then we must sadly conclude that much of our eternal life/marriage depends on that evil empire that we denounce week after week.
Or is theology for an explanation? Do Latter Day Saints Since we view the body in definitely more positive terms than traditional Christian orthodoxy does, do we tend to place a greater emphasis on physical attractiveness? Does this explain Utah's excellent ranking in national obesity rankings? (it ranks 45th?)
Finally, if I am correct, I wonder whether deconstructing such media images is worthwhile for the Latter Day Saint...can/should the LDS man/woman "deprogram" their preferences? I leave our friendly readers to decide.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Jell-O Does a Body Good?: Attractiveness and the Physical-Spiritual Dichotomy in Mormon Culture
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hello. I found your blog a few weeks ago and enjoy your thoughts. I had to comment on this article. I sadly have to admit that I purposely not continued to date someone seriously because I was not physically attracted to him, even though he had everything else. Worthy priesthood holder, made me laugh, awesome personality etc. But, you made a good point: We as mormons are not immune to our hormones. However, we are going to have sex when we're married and it would be very hard to have sex with someone I wasn't attracted to. But, maybe that's just me.
You should talk to my husband sometime about what he thought about me when we were dating. Well, maybe I'll just tell you. I can never figure out if this is one of my favorite stories or if I absolutely hate it. He always says that he felt absolutely no physical attraction to me. And I have to admit, I look unlike any other girl he had ever dated. He says that there were other things he found attractive but that getting over the lack of physical attraction was an immense barrier for him. Eventually he prayed about it, went ahead and dated me for a while, and slowly received a new vision of me. He says that I changed in his eyes. That with familiarity, I became attractive to him. Now, granted, I would love to think that I'm a pretty girl, which is why I sometimes have a hard time with that story. But at the same time, it is very comforting to know that the longer we are together, the more attractive he finds me. Shared experiences and goals, as well as daily exposure, make us more attractive (and not less) as time passes.
I admire my husband for that choice and I'm, of course, glad that he decided to give an interesting but not ideally proportioned girl a chance. I, however, married one of the very few men I found physically attractive. Which is a point of pride for my husband. I love that he gave up the girl in his mind's eye for me; he loves that he was the incarnation of my dreams. Which is better?
Post a Comment